Armenian Music Albums

TS aradley has a proven record of undermining the state and its institutions. Who pioneered artificial depreciation of USD under the guise of ?strengthening the Dram?? Has this been beneficial to a large segment of the populace who heavily depend on remittances from abroad because their own government provides compensation, pensions, etc. commensurate to peanuts, while pouring money for luxurious villas, cars, restaurants, and casino gambling? Has this bolstered the state and improved people?s lives? I don?t think so. Nor does any unbiased, adept economist, I?m sure. TS would lead a campaign within the strict limits, or limitations, rather, and impositions of his masters. This is as clear as the daylight. How can a reformist or a moderate ruler, if we admit him as such, do anything beyond or anything different from his masters? general line? Where exactly is the room for optimism here?To assert that one would support a group in Armenia who are rallying behind a leader with positive vision, if he is shown one, is somewhat cynical, I?m sorry to say. It reminds me of a chicken-and-egg story. Where would a leader with positive vision emerge from if opposition of any sort is ruthlessly incapacitated? Of course, there is a need to cultivate a vigorous opposition, but is there a recipe of how to do this artificially? I think things should have been left on the natural balance of a nation?s successes and failures. People should have been given more confidence and people?s choice to decide whom they wanted to support should have been respected. I tend to believe that if it were for people?s true choice (Manoukian in 1996, K. Demirchian in 1998, S. Demirchian in 2003), we might have seen a different leader and a different opposition in 2008. In other words, things would have progressed naturally as of now. With their own shortcomings, of course, but naturally.About optimism. I meant groundless optimism, and not optimism per se. I tend not to speculate on hypothetical notions such as this, but believe that feeding disillusioned people with a ?better future? fairy tale is as much destructive as radical negativism. People are tired of such groundless optimism and their wide-spread apathy is the best manifestation to this. And here again, who are we to preach them, even if this is considered peaceful, non-destructive preaching? Have more confidence in people and their own judgments. People did not demand destructive measures when gathered on the streets in March. Nor have they followed LTP?s propaganda by initiating street fights or other forms of violence. They responded violently only after the government troops started provocations, brutal use of force, and killings en masse.